2025-01-28 · 7 min
All-on-4 vs All-on-6 in Mersin: A Clinical Comparison for Full-Arch Candidates
We compare bone volume requirements, load distribution, and recovery timelines for both protocols.

All-on-4 is ideal when posterior bone is limited, allowing us to deliver a fixed provisional on the same day while keeping the number of implants low.
All-on-6 offers broader support in cases with sufficient posterior height, improving load distribution and reducing long-term prosthetic maintenance.
At Klinik33 we combine CBCT, bite analysis, and age-related bone quality to determine the best option, then tailor sedation choices and healing protocols to each patient.